DETAILED TIMELINE OF MAJOR EVENTS
See Links Above for More Information

 

GOVERNING DOCUMENTS

ORIGINAL METAXIDES LAWSUIT (2006)

CONSENT ORDER (2009)

COLLINS LAWSUIT (2009)

APPLICATION FOR JOINDER (2010)

LAWSUIT AGAINST CONSENT ORDER (2010)

INJUNCTIVE ORDER (2010)

COUNTERCLAIMS (2011)

APPEAL OF JUDGMENT (2012-2013)

SECURITY OF COSTS OF APPEAL (2012)

APPEAL TO PRIVY COUNCIL (2013)

 

 

APOLLON METAXIDES ET AL. VS. SILVER POINT LTD. 2006

The instigator of all the recent legal action at Silver Point is this lawsuit, brought by Apollon Metaxides on behalf of himself and five other unit owners, against Silver Point.  The lawsuit asked the court to make 8 declarations including:

a)  The proper method of disbursing the funds from the insurance settlement following the hurricanes of 2004-2005 to the unit owners

b) That the BOD must draw up a scheme for reconstruction of the building and have it approved at a general meeting.

c) That the BOD must give 45 days notice of an EGM and must enforce the byelaws.

d) That the BOD must make receipts and expenditures from the disbursement available to unit owners for inspection and that they have failed to do so.

e)  Whether or not doors and windows are common property and which windows or doors were not installed in the manner directed by Page 15 of the rules & regulations.

f)  The method by which doors and windows can be altered for protection against hurricanes and water leakage.

g) That the BOD must maintain A/C units and remove them from the stairwells.

Originating Summons - January 11, 2006
This is the originating document stating the relief mentioned above, plus that Metaxides was seeking to have his costs paid by Silver Point.  Mr. Metaxides' attorney is Edwin Knowles, a fellow unit owner, who in 2004-2005 was retained by Silver Point during the time his wife and Mr. Metaxides were on the Board of Directors and during the time that the first insurance distribution was received by Silver Point.  Mrs. Knowles and Mr. Metaxides left the BOD at about the same time that the services from Mr. Knowles were discontinued.  Mr. Knowles represents Metaxides in suing Silver Point about the very same matters about which he was advising Silver Point about as their attorney just a few months earlier.

Injunctive Order - January 14, 2006
This court order was sought by Mr. Metaxides to prevent the owners present at the 2006 AGM from authorizing by resolution installation of any windows that had not been certified by an engineer to comply with the GBPA Building Code, or from managing insurance money received after the hurricanes in a way inconsistent with the Condominium Act.  Costs were reserved, meaning the winner of the litigation will receive costs from the other party.  However, the BOD relinquished rights to these funds when they signed the Consent Order.

Transcript of the First Hearing - January 23, 2007
The court states that the case is not ready for trial, and refers it to the dispute resolution conference to try to work out the issues.  Mr. Knowles appears for Apollon Metaxides and Robert Adams appears for Silver Point.  This follows a note sent to counsel on December 4, 2006, indicating that it was recommending to do so.

AGM - January 20, 2007
A committee is assigned to represent the owners at the Dispute Resolution Conference, and empowering them to negotiate a settlement.  The committee consists of two current directors (Larry Biswanger and Graham Groves) and two newly elected directors (Brian Cromwell and Peter Kaklamanakis).

Robert Adams to Apollon Metaxides - April 4, 2007
Mr. Adams refers to a letter received from Mr. Metaxides, and states that the two sides are so far apart that they should skip the Dispute Resolution Conference and go before a judge for a Case Management Conference.

Brian Cromwell to Apollon Metaxides - October 15, 2008
Mr. Cromwell informs Mr. Metaxides that his terms of settlement are not accepted by the Board, and in fact impossible to meet.  He informs Mr. Metaxides that there is only one way to settle this, and that is to continue to trial.  Despite this, the proposed terms of settlement are almost exactly the same as those later contained in the Consent Order, signed in June 2009.

There has been no evidence provided to the court as to what happened during the 8 months between refusal of the terms by the BOD and agreement to nearly the same terms in the Consent Order.  There was no correspondence with the owners until after the Consent Order had been signed.  There is no evidence of any consultation with the Dispute Resolution Committee or Silver Point's attorney, Robert Adams during this time.

Continue to see the Consent Order