DETAILED TIMELINE OF MAJOR EVENTS
See Links Above for More Information
GOVERNING DOCUMENTS
ORIGINAL METAXIDES LAWSUIT (2006)
CONSENT ORDER (2009)
COLLINS LAWSUIT (2009)
APPLICATION FOR JOINDER (2010)
LAWSUIT AGAINST
CONSENT ORDER (2010)
INJUNCTIVE ORDER (2010)
COUNTERCLAIMS (2011)
APPEAL OF JUDGMENT
(2012-2013)
SECURITY OF COSTS OF APPEAL (2012)
APPEAL TO PRIVY
COUNCIL (2013)
|
TIMELINE OF
EVENTS This page is an overview of the ongoing
litigation at Silver Point beginning with the original lawsuit by
Metaxides et al, the settlement and Consent Order resulting from it,
and the subsequent litigation that followed.
For more detailed information, including links to documents, you
can navigate the process using the links on the left side of the
page. For a detailed timeline of all evidence submitted in the course
of the trial,
click here.
JANUARY 11, 2006 |
Apollon Metaxides, on behalf of himself and five other
owners, files a lawsuit against Silver Point, primarily
dealing with distribution of hurricane funds, but also
seeking access to documents allegedly being withheld by the
Board of Directors, and a declaration as to if windows and
doors are common property. Robert Adams of Graham,
Thompson & Co. is retained to represent Silver Point in the
matter, while Edwin Knowles of Sessions House represents Mr.
Metaxides. Mr. Knowles is a unit owner, and was on retainer
for Silver Point at the time the action was filed. (See
Details) |
|
|
JANUARY 14, 2006 |
Metaxides obtains an injunction against Silver Point, in
order to stop discussion of disbursement of hurricane funds
at the 2006 AGM, and also to stop any authorization of
window installations that do not meet building code or have
the supervision of an engineer. |
|
|
JANUARY 23, 2007 |
Judge states that the case is not ready for trial, and
refers the parties to a dispute resolution conference to
work out their differences. |
|
|
MARCH 10, 2007 |
AGM. Committee consisting of two prior Board
members (Larry Biswanger and Graham Groves) and two new
Board members (Brian Cromwell and Peter Kaklamanakis) is
appointed by the owners to negotiate with Metaxides and try
to work out a settlement. |
|
|
APRIL 4, 2007 |
Robert Adams states the sides are too far apart and they
should skip the conference and proceed to case management
before a judge. |
|
|
OCTOBER 22, 2008 |
Justice Evans recuses herself from the case, citing a
conflict of interest. She had executed some of the
supporting documents herself as a practicing attorney. |
|
|
JUNE 19, 2009 |
A Consent Order signed by Brian Cromwell and Apollon
Metaxides is filed with the court. Owners are notified
that it has been enacted as law and they must comply.
No consultation with the committee or Silver Point counsel,
Robert Adams, took place. No owners had prior
notification or a chance to weigh in, and the terms of the
Order were immediately disputed as illegal by several
attorneys who were residents of Silver Point, most notably
Doug Collins (who threatened a lawsuit), and other owners. (See
Details) |
|
|
JANUARY 16, 2010 |
AGM. A committee is formed to try to reach a
settlement and avoid further legal action. |
|
|
JANUARY 22, 2010 |
The committee meets, but Director Labrie disbands the committee
after one meeting. In an attempt
to salvage discussions and avoid litigation, Directors Swart
and Manley form a subcommittee that will report to the greater
committee their findings prior to the reconvened AGM.
A scheduled meeting with Doug Collins to work out a settlement
is canceled by Director Labrie. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 8, 2010 |
The door now closed to negotiation, Doug Collins files a lawsuit against Brian Cromwell and
the Board of Directors, claiming they acted without
authority and seeking to have the Consent Order set aside.
(See Details) |
|
|
FEBRUARY 9, 2010 |
Doug Collins files for injunctive relief to stop the BOD
from enforcing the Consent Order until the matter can be
ruled on by a judge. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 18, 2010 |
Subcommittee reports significant
potential legal issues with the Consent Order and recommends
to obtain further legal advice as to the merits of the
Collins Claim before responding. Remaining BOD rejects
the advice and appoints Brian Cromwell to be the sole point of
contact for the Board's attorney, despite being a personally
named defendant. Against Subcommittee recommendations, Constance McDonald appears
in court on behalf
of the Board of Directors and Brian Cromwell. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 21, 2010 |
Director Johann Swart resigns in protest
and warns of the implications of the BoD's actions.
A letter
is sent to all owners. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 22, 2010 |
Director John Manley resigns in protest.
A letter
is sent to the BOD. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 22, 2010 |
First injunction hearing. Judge declares windows
are not common property, and that the clause in the Consent
Order that declares them as such is invalid. He orders
the parties to go back and discuss the matter and come to a
resolution agreeable to all. (Read
Transcript) |
|
|
MARCH 19, 2010 |
The BOD and Metaxides file an Amended Consent Order that
removes the declaration about common property and extends
the compliance date. Mr. Collins was not consulted
prior to the filing. |
|
|
APRIL 20, 2010 |
A summons for joinder is filed by six unit owners -
Johann Swart, Larry Biswanger, Bill & Susan Taylor, Scott
Moncrieff, Carol Haythorne and Toni Donato. The
purpose is to appeal the Consent Order. (See
Details) |
|
|
APRIL 22, 2010 |
Rengin Johnson, attorney for Doug Collins, fails to
appear and the injunction application is dismissed for
non-appearance. |
|
|
MAY 11, 2010 |
Robert Adams (Silver Point's
Attorney)
writes to the BOD, informing them that had
he been consulted, he would have advised that the Consent
Order contains terms that do not comply with the law. |
|
|
MAY 12, 2010 |
Brian Cromwell
writes back, disputing Mr. Adams' advice
and informs him that he's been fired. Cromwell asserts
that the Amended Order is valid. |
|
|
MAY 13, 2010 |
Robert Adams
responds that the Amended Order is
similarly defective. No owners are notified of this
advice by Silver Point's attorney. |
|
|
MAY 18, 2010 |
Scheduled Hearing for Joinder does not take place due to
a misfiled document. Registrar directs parties to
refile with a judge. |
|
|
JUNE 14, 2010 |
Callender's & Co. sends a
letter to all owners advising
of pending legal action. |
|
|
JULY 19, 2010 |
Callender's & Co. sends
letters to all interested
parties, and all owners, advising of the illegality of the
Consent Order, the possibility of personal liability for the
Board Members, and inviting all parties to negotiate to
avoid further legal costs. There is no response. (See
all Letters) |
|
|
SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 |
Collins withdraws lawsuit against Silver Point with
prejudice to file another one if necessary. |
|
|
OCTOBER 6, 2010 |
Swart et al. withdraw joinder summons
with prejudice. |
|
|
NOVEMBER 25, 2010 |
With no response whatsoever to
their letters and requests for negotitation and settlement,
a lawsuit is filed by Callender's & Co. on behalf of
four unit owners - Johann Swart, Larry Biswanger, Bill
Taylor and Scott Moncrieff - against Apollon Metaxides and
Silver Point. The suit seeks to have the Consent Order
declared illegal, invalid and unenforceable, and also seeks
to have Metaxides return the $25,000 granted him by BOD in
the Consent Order. (See Details) |
|
|
NOVEMBER 25, 2010 |
Callender's & Co. sends
a letter to the BOD asking them
to voluntarily agree not to enforce the Consent Order in
order to save the legal costs of an injunction. There
is no response. |
|
|
DECEMBER 9, 2010 |
After receiving no response to
their request, Swart et al. file for injunctive relief, seeking to stop
the BOD from enforcing the Consent Order until its legality
can be determined. (See
Details) |
|
|
DECEMBER 13, 2010 |
Metaxides files a summons seeking to have Callender's &
Co. recused for conflict of interest. The summons is
later withdrawn, with costs payable by Metaxides to the
Plaintiffs. |
|
|
DECEMBER 15, 2010 |
First Injunction Hearing. BOD replaces McDonald &
Co. with Gail Lockhart-Charles from Nassau. BoD
objects to owners being present in the courtroom despite
paying for the attorney who is representing them. Court
rules that owners have a right to be present for the
hearings. Plaintiffs again request voluntary agreement
by the BOD not to enforce to avoid further costs.
Their requests are again refused. |
|
|
DECEMBER 22, 2010 |
Metaxides files a summons seeking to have the joinder
summons struck as being an abuse of process. The
summons is later withdrawn. Costs Ordered to be paid by
Metaxides to the Plaintiffs. |
|
|
JANUARY 5, 2011 |
Second Injunction Hearing. Metaxides withdraws
conflict summons and joinder strike-out summons. Costs
again Ordered to be paid by Metaxides to the Plaintiffs. |
|
|
JANUARY 22, 2011 |
AGM. Directors Cromwell, Labrie, Rosselli and
Kaklamanakis are re-elected, and Toni Donato, Ben Zuk, and
Larry Biswanger are elected as new Board Members.
Chairman Labrie refuses all requests to discuss the lawsuit. |
|
|
JANUARY 28, 2011 |
Third Injunction Hearing. BOD finally agrees not
to enforce the Consent Order until its legality can be
determined, in effect granting the injunction that they
could have agreed to in the beginning and no money would
have been spent. Instead, hundreds of thousands of owner
dollars are wasted. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 8, 2011 |
Plaintiffs seek leave to amend their action to include a
request that the costs of the action should be paid by the
individual Board Members and Mr. Metaxides and not the unit
owners. The BoD, acting in conflict of interest,
refuses to consent and a hearing is scheduled. |
|
|
MARCH 23, 2011 |
Hearing for Leave to Amend the action. Leave is
granted. |
|
|
MARCH 29, 2011 |
Callender's & Co. sends
letters to Brian Cromwell, Peter Kaklamanakis, Warren Labrie, Robert Rosselli and Eddie
Llambias, notifying them of the cost claim against them. |
|
|
MAY 6, 2011 |
Silver Point files for Leave to File a Counterclaim
against the plaintiffs.
(See Details) |
|
|
MAY 13, 2011 |
Metaxides applies for Leave to File a Counterclaim against
the plaintiffs. |
|
|
MAY 18, 2011 |
Hearing for Leave to File a Counterclaim. Both
applications are dismissed as lacking a substantive claim,
with costs to be paid by Metaxides and SPCA. Another
estimated $100,000 in wasted owner's money. |
|
|
JUNE 1, 2011 |
Director Ben Zuk resigns in protest.
Sends
a letter to all owners. |
|
|
JUNE 5, 2011 |
Director Toni Donato resigns in protest.
Sends
a letter to all owners. |
|
|
JUNE 6, 2011 |
Director Larry Biswanger resigns in protest.
Sends
a letter to all owners. |
|
|
NOVEMBER 7, 2011 |
Trial to determine the legality of the Consent Order
begins. (See Details) |
|
|
NOVEMBER 10, 2011 |
Trial ends. Parties await the judge's decision. |
|
|
MARCH 16, 2012 |
Judgment issued in favor of the defendants.
Plaintiffs inform Silver Point and Metaxides that they plan to appeal, and
ask them to voluntarily agree not to enforce the order until
the appeal can be heard (in order to save costs).
Defendants again refuse. |
|
|
APRIL 4, 2012 |
Plaintiffs file for a Stay of Enforcement Pending Appeal
to prevent the judgment and Consent Order from being
enforced until the appeal can be heard. (See
Details). |
|
|
APRIL 26, 2012 |
Plaintiffs file a Notice of Appeal with the Court of
Appeals. (See
Details). |
|
|
APRIL 26, 2012 |
SPCA files a
Bill of Costs for the Trial in the amount of $180,345.00 |
|
|
AUGUST 9, 2012 |
Appellants amend the Notice of Appeal to include,
inter alia, a request that the Directors be made to pay
the costs of the action, and not the owners. Grounds of
Appeal are increased to 34 Distinct Points of Law. |
|
|
OCTOBER 24, 2012 |
Brian Cromwell sends out a notification to all owners
that the Appeal has been dismissed for non-compliance, costs
to be paid by the Appellants. |
|
|
NOVEMBER 5, 2012 |
Appeal is reinstated and erroneous notification is
rescinded. |
|
|
NOVEMBER 5, 2012 |
Court of Appeals grants a Stay of Execution Pending
Appeal. |
|
|
NOVEMBER 5, 2012 |
Respondents file an application for Security for costs
of the Appeal to be placed by the Appellants before
proceeding. DENIED. SPCA and Metaxides ordered to pay
$2,500 in costs to the Appellants. |
|
|
NOVEMBER 29, 2012 |
First Hearing before the Court of Appeals. Court
takes up Appellants' first ground of appeal as a preliminary
point, to be decided before continuing on to the remaining
33 grounds of appeal. If Appellants win on the point, the
appellants win the case. If they lose, then the case
moves to point #2. |
|
|
JANUARY 15, 2013 |
Hearings on the Preliminary Point continue.
Respondents are given more time to come up with support for
their arguments. |
|
|
MARCH 4, 2013 |
Final Hearing on Preliminary Point. |
|
|
MAY 2, 2013 |
Court of Appeals issues a unanimous ruling of the
3-judge panel in favor of the Appellants. Ruling of
lower court judge is overturned, all costs payable to the
Appellants to be taxed if not agreed. BoD announces
intent to appeal to the Privy Council. |
|
|
JUNE 11, 2013 |
Court of Appeals specifically excludes the Appellants
from any costs in the matter, and clarifies that the owners
of Silver Point (and not the Directors) are liable for the
costs of the action. |
|
|
JUNE 11, 2013 |
Metaxides tries to introduce fresh evidence.
DENIED. Costs of $1,500.00 Ordered to be paid to the
Appellants. |
|
|
JUNE 11, 2013 |
Metaxides applies for Leave to Appeal to the Privy
Council. DENIED. |
|
|
JUNE 11, 2013 |
Silver Point applies for Leave to Appeal to the Privy
Council. GRANTED. |
|
|
JULY 2, 2013 |
Metaxides applies for Special Leave to Appeal to the
Privy Council. |
|
|
AUGUST 2, 2013 |
Silver Point files Notice of Appeal with Privy Council.
(See
Details). |
|
|
AUGUST 2, 2013 |
Callender's & Co. Files
Bill of Costs in Appeal Proceedings in the amount of
$377,896.45. |
|
|
AUGUST 19, 2013 |
Callender's & Co. Files
Bill of Costs in Counterclaim
Proceedings in the amount of $97,203.33. |
|
|
AUGUST 19, 2013 |
Callender's & Co. Files
Bill of Costs in Supreme Court
Proceedings in the amount of $1,050,435.43. |
|
|
AUGUST 23, 2013 |
The Respondents file their objections to SPCA's Appeal to the
Privy Council. |
|
|
JANUARY 13, 2014 |
Silver Point and Metaxides object to taxation
proceeding, citing certain documents filed out of time.
The Court of Appeal
dismisses their objections, awarding all costs of both
this hearing and the hearing on October 23, 2013, plus all
costs of the application to the Appellants. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 12, 2014 |
Silver Point Applies for Final Leave to Appeal to the
Privy Council. |
|
|
FEBRUARY 14, 2014 |
Metaxides is granted leave to Appeal to the Privy
Council. |
|
|
MARCH 31, 2014 |
Silver Point and Metaxides object to the filing of the
final Judgment Order of Appeal, claiming that despite
winning the Appeal, the Appellants were not entitled to any
of the relief sought in the Appeal. The Matter
returned to the Court of Appeals, who
dismissed their objections and expressly clarified that
ALL relief sought in the Appeal had been granted, including
the Consent Order being Set Aside (removed from the record)
and Metaxides being Ordered to repay the $25,000 to Silver
Point Owners. |
|
|
APRIL 14, 2014 |
Callender's & Co. Files
Bill of Costs in the Objection Proceedings of January
13, 2014, in the amount of
$106,871.91. |
MORE
INFORMATION
See our Frequently Asked Questions for more
information about how your rights and your finances may be affected
by the outcome of the action. Anything you don't see, you are
always welcome to ask
us. |